| |
Don't Cry to Them, Argentina: Is Monsanto playing fast and loose with Roundup Ready Soybeans in Argentina?
By Kelly Hearn,
GRIST, 22 Sep
2006
[Kelly Hearn is a writer in South America.
He is a former UPI staff reporter and a correspondent for
the Christian Science Monitor and other publications.]
Crying not for Argentina but for lost patent fees,
Monsanto's legal hacks are in European courts suing to block
millions of tons of Argentine soybean meal from docking on
the continent.
Monsanto says that much of the
meal crossing the Atlantic to feed Europe's cows and pigs
contains traces of its genetically modified Roundup Ready
Soybeans. Known as RR, the soybeans are tweaked to withstand
the company's Roundup herbicide. This resistance lets
farmers blanket entire fields with the chemical mixture
rather than surgically applying it to kill off weeds.
Monsanto holds a patent for the seed in Europe, but
not in Argentina, where a dispute over technology rights
keeps the U.S.-based agri-giant from collecting technology
fees on RR seed sales. By using its European patent to
disrupt Argentina's lucrative soy-meal trade with Europe,
the company hopes to strong-arm Argentine farmers into
paying up.
Meanwhile, the tricky lawyering is
shedding light on what critics say is a dubious corporate
strategy to make Argentina a mega-lab for GM soybeans, one
that's already spawned deep environmental and economic
problems far off the radar screen of the international
media.
The Patent Play
Walking into
the Social Forum for the Resistance Against Industrialized
Agriculture in downtown Buenos Aires last month, I wasn't
sure what to expect. Instead of suits and ties, I found lots
of facial hair and rumpled clothes -- technology wonks,
students, professors, scientists, and landless peasant
farmers gathered to protest the sins of large-scale
industrial agriculture. One middle-aged water-quality
activist wore a papier-mache spigot on his head. An
interpretive artist twirled a rubber hose and let out angry
groans. Though less legible than the speakers' PowerPoints,
her message seemed thematically congruent: the soy is
hitting the fan in Argentina -- and Monsanto's bad behavior
is to blame.
I got a café cortado and
searched out Adolfo Boy, an agronomist with the Grupo de
Reflexion Rural, a technology watchdog group. "Ask
yourself why Monsanto, with all its lawyers, never got a
patent for gene RR in Argentina," he said, thumbing
through a binder exploding with dated newspaper clips.
He rewound to the 1990s, when the firm brought its
new genetically tweaked seeds to Argentina. His theory --
shared by many here -- is that Monsanto intentionally left
RR seeds in the public domain so Argentine farmers would use
them, spread them, create new plant varieties, and, most
important, lock themselves into buying the pricey Roundup
herbicide.
Argentina first approved RR seeds in
1996, and Monsanto tried to build its royalty fees into the
price, but a thriving black market kept the seed prices too
low for the company to recoup the fees. Meanwhile, up in the
land of strong patent enforcement, U.S. farmers were paying
a $6.50 patent-based technology fee every time they bought a
50-pound bag of RR seed. Around that time, seeds that sold
for $9 a bag in Argentina were going for $21.50 in the
United States. A report issued at the time by the U.S.
government's General Accounting Office blamed the price
difference on lack of property-rights enforcement in
Argentina. The American Soybean Association asked Monsanto
to refund more than $300 million to U.S. farmers. The
company refused.
As Argentina struggled to
recover from a devastating economic collapse that hit in
2001, the illegal trade in RR seeds grew. By 2005, according
to one estimate, only 20 percent of Argentina's $1 billion
annual soybean seed trade was legal. Monsanto had had
enough. It stopped direct seed sales in 2003, though
Argentine companies continued to sell seeds containing RR
genes and paid some licensing fees.
Having missed
out on the chance to collect fees at the point of sale,
Monsanto lawyers in 2004 said the company would charge a
$1-per-ton export fee on Argentine soy and soy derivatives
shipped abroad (and $2.50 per ton between 2006 and 2011).
Argentina's farmers and government officials refused.
Monsanto has denied that it made a strategic
decision not to pursue patent rights in Argentina. It didn't
respond to requests for comment for this story, but in an
open letter published in an Argentine paper, El Clarin,
Monsanto rebuffed the public-domain theory, claiming the
company tried to get a patent but was blocked by
legalities.
Evidence suggests otherwise: as
farmers were getting to know its RR seeds, Monsanto did not
object -- as Argentine law allows it to do -- when farmers
registered some 200 plant varieties containing Monsanto's RR
technology with the National Seed Institute, according to a
report by the French newspaper Le Monde Diplomatic. Had
Monsanto been truly interested in exercising legal rights
over RR seed, the theory goes, it would have made use of the
law, stopping others from incorporating it in other
varieties.
Monocultural a Manos
What's
clearer than Monsanto's patent strategy is the astounding
rate at which the RR soybean took hold, and the
repercussions it has wrought.
Since RR was
approved for use here in 1996, Argentine jungles and
savannas have been cleared to make room for more than 34
million acres of the crop.
The rate at which
forests in northern Argentina are being turned into soy
plantations is three to six times higher than the world
average, and the country now ranks second only to the United
States as the biggest producer of GM crops in the world.
As GM operations push out traditional farming here,
civil and environmental groups are crying foul, making
Argentina a case study for the technology's unintended
economic, social, and environmental consequences.
Agronomists say the herbicide-resistant soybean is leading
to serious problems, including deforestation, soil
degradation, pesticide pollution, and genetic
contamination.
"Argentina is placing its
future economy and food security in danger by choosing to
ignore the ecological downside of such heavy reliance on a
no-till, herbicide-based system," said Charles
Benbrook, an agronomist and consultant who worked for the
Carter administration and conducted a study in 2005 on GM
soy's impacts in Argentina. "They are going to run into
serious problems."
GM cheerleaders say the
crops enhance food security, feeding the hungry masses with
higher yield power. But statistics fall crossways. Walter
Pengue of the University of Buenos Aires and Miguel Altieri
of the University of California-Berkeley report that wheat,
dairy, and fruit production has dropped significantly in
Argentina as farmland has turned to soybean monoculture.
Monsanto claims RR soybeans decrease the need for
repeated herbicide applications. But some weeds build
resistance to herbicides, and when they do, different
herbicides are needed in the mix. Pengue and Altieri report
that in the Argentinean pampas, eight species of weeds
exhibit resistance to glyphosate, the active ingredient in
Roundup. The fear: the more plants become resistant, the
more farmers turn to different pesticides, further
complicating the soup of poisons being spread through the
country's fields.
There are also concerns that
all this genetic tinkering is causing GM soy to have lower
protein levels than regular varieties. A study published in
the Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry in 2004
analyzed soybeans and soybean meal from the world's top
producers: Argentina, Brazil, China, India, and the U.S.
Those from Argentina, which Benbrook says at the time were
98 percent Roundup Ready, had the lowest crude protein
content. Those from China, which grew no GM soy at the time,
had the highest. "This points directly to the
possibility that RR has resulted in significant decline in
protein level," Benbrook said, adding that it mirrors
concerns that protein levels in soy and corn in the United
States are decreasing.
Meanwhile, experts say
that GM crops may be playing a role in rising social
dislocation. In 1998 there were 422,000 producers or local
farmers in Argentina; by 2002, that number had dropped by 25
percent to 318,000.
And there are health worries
stemming from the widespread use of Roundup, which has
reportedly been sprayed aerially and drifted onto non-RR
crops and into communities. Dario Gianfelici, a general
physician from the small town of Cerrito in a soy farming
region, says he has seen medical problems in farmhands that
stem from herbicide exposure. "I don't have the money
or the manpower to [raise awareness] like I would like to
do," he said in a telephone interview, "but I
continue to talk about this."
Attention,
Class
With people like Gianfelici and Boy
sounding alarms, Monsanto is scrambling to bolster its
public image. To create a new generation of customers
friendly to the idea of consuming GM products, it has joined
the likes of Bayer S.A. and Dow AgroSciences Argentina S.A.
in funding ArgenBio, a trade association that offers teacher
workshops and downloadable educational materials for use in
Argentine schools. Gabriela Levitus, ArgenBio's director,
says the group's purpose is "to divulge information
about biotechnology."
One woman's
information is another woman's propaganda. Said Silvie Sieb,
a grade-school teacher from the province of Entre Rios who
attended one of the workshops, "It's pure show business
so they can turn kids into customers."
Sieb
said the presenters explained how "inofensivo" the
RR soybeans and Roundup herbicide are. But, she said,
"They did not say that it is destroying our soil and
reducing biological and productive diversity with a
monoculture cultivation that serves to feed the pigs of
Europe and Asia, and next the cars of Europe with soy-based
biodiesel."
Meanwhile, over in Europe, a
body of the European Union released a nonbinding decision in
August saying it disagrees with Monsanto's claims that soy
meal derived from genetically modified seeds infringes the
company's patents. But Monsanto's lawyers are still
beavering away, undeterred.
|
|
|